Ranorex Forum

Hi

I have a code module as follows. I use a parameter in RxPath

I run this code, the specified RxPath can be found.

But I call this sub in other code module, It can't find the specified RxPath. Does the parameter lose efficacy if it is called in other code module ?

Hi Shellyhu,

The following code should work for you:

Dim _Ele As String = ""
      <TestVariable("D498FD3D-F9B3-4CED-B43E-6B5E5C530484")> _
      Public Property Ele As String
         Get
            Return _Ele
         End Get
         Set(ByVal value As String)
            _Ele = value
         End Set
      End Property

                Public Sub aaaa
                  Ele = "1234"
                        Dim _RawText As Ranorex.RawText = Nothing
         Dim found As Boolean = Host.Local.TryFindSingle(Of Ranorex.RawText) _
         ("/form[@title~'home']/rawtext[@rawtext~"+Ele+"]", 10000, _RawText)
         report.Info(found.ToString)
      End Sub

The problems seems that Ranorex doesn't know that "$Ele" is actually a variable when you execute the method from another module, so it should be okay when you use " "+Ele+" " instead.

In case "aaaa" is a recording I would use the following code:

Dim _aa As bbbb = bbbb.Instance
            _aa .aaaa()

and I would highly recommend using meaningful names for your classes and methods.

Regards,
Markus

Hi,

Thank you for your suggestion.

I use your method to run my scrip, but it also can't find the element. Even though run it without calling it in other code module.

I try it on two computers, the same result happens.

My Ranorex version is 5.0.2.
(If I use the latest version, there is another problem. So I haven't upgraded. Link: http://drafttest.ranorex.com/forum/exce ... t5413.html )

Hi Shellyhu,

When the element cannot be found at all it is most likely a problem with the used RxPath.
Could you therefore please check if you use the right RxPath to identify the specific element?
I tested the code I provided on my machine with another RxPath and everything worked well, so the method should be fine.

Regards,
Markus